The Indian government is reassessing its plan to mandate joint audits for large companies, a proposal aimed at enhancing audit quality and accountability. Joint audits involve multiple audit firms collaborating to audit a single company, potentially improving financial transparency and reducing risks associated with audit failures.

Background

In recent years, there have been discussions about implementing joint audits for large corporations in India. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has supported this initiative, suggesting that joint audits could enhance audit quality and promote transparency. However, major audit firms, including the Big Four (EY, PwC, Deloitte, and KPMG), have expressed concerns, citing potential increases in costs and complexities without a guaranteed improvement in audit quality.

PW Live

Current Status

As of October 2023, the government is exploring changes to the Companies Act to require joint audits for big companies, aiming to improve accountability in case of audit errors.

PW Live The proposal is under review, with considerations for a phased implementation starting with public interest entities and large listed companies.

Financial Express

Stakeholder Perspectives

  • Supporters: Proponents argue that joint audits can enhance audit quality, reduce the risk of fraud, and promote transparency in financial reporting. They believe that involving multiple audit firms can provide diverse perspectives and mitigate the concentration of audit services among a few large firms. PW Live
  • Opponents: Critics, particularly large audit firms, contend that mandatory joint audits may lead to increased costs and operational challenges without necessarily improving audit outcomes. They also raise concerns about the division of responsibility and potential conflicts between audit firms. Economic Times CFO

Implications

If implemented, mandatory joint audits could significantly impact the auditing landscape in India. Companies may need to engage multiple audit firms, leading to changes in audit planning, execution, and reporting processes. Additionally, audit firms may need to collaborate more closely, necessitating adjustments in their operational and strategic approaches.

Conclusion

The government’s reassessment of the mandatory joint audit proposal reflects the complexity of balancing audit quality, accountability, and operational feasibility. Stakeholders are advised to stay informed about developments in this area, as any changes to audit requirements could have substantial implications for corporate governance and financial reporting practices in India.